Is each function of the service understood in terms of its importance in the service ?
Life cycle
B People
B Planet
B Prosperity
Difficulty
N/A
Priority
/
Récurrence
/
Tests
Has a 80/20 approach been applied for each function in relation to its environmental footprint and its importance?
Precisions
The most important functions sometimes consume less resources than non-core functions, which does not fit with a coherent Sustainable IT approach.
Additional elements
Rule for assessing the level of compliance of the criterion
0 / 0
Life cycle
Conception
13 other criteria related to the recommendation: Set up a methodology that promotes the consideration of Sustainable IT aspects
Life cycle
Is the envisioned functionality useful ?
Life cycle
Are the Sustainable IT aspects propagated and maintained across all stakeholders ?
Life cycle
Was a benchmark on the environmental criteria carried out for the choice of the infrastructure supplier ?
Life cycle
Does the design process / tools integrate the treatment of Sustainable IT requirements ?
Architecture
Does the sizing of infrastructure resources follow the life of the application ?
Architecture
Is the technical architecture permanently in line with the activity of the service ?
Architecture
Is a summary of use cases of the features available ?
Architecture
Are de-provisioning operations expressed at design time ?
Architecture
Are all the technical equipment used by the service identified ?
Architecture
Are the characteristics available for each equipment (year of construction, environmental performance data...) ?
Life cycle
Do secondary functions also have a lower impact on the environmental footprint ?
Life cycle
Is each phase of the life cycle identified with specific actions ?
Life cycle
IsLCA data reused in the event of an adaptation of an existing service ?