Does the sizing of infrastructure resources follow the life of the application ?
Architecture
B People
B Planet
A Prosperity
Difficulty
**
Priority
Medium
Récurrence
Periodic
Tests
Is metrology defined and implemented?
Precisions
The utilisation rate of the physical resources of the infrastructure should be monitored to allow better use of the available hardware and to avoid deploying additional elements when the utilisation rate is incomplete.
Use Case
Configration management
Additional elements
Operational issues related to the project
Rule for assessing the level of compliance of the criterion
Formalized = 100 ; Planned = 75 ; Identified = 50 ; Ignored = 0 / 100
Life cycle
Administration
13 other criteria related to the recommendation: Set up a methodology that promotes the consideration of Sustainable IT aspects
Life cycle
Is the envisioned functionality useful ?
Life cycle
Are the Sustainable IT aspects propagated and maintained across all stakeholders ?
Life cycle
Was a benchmark on the environmental criteria carried out for the choice of the infrastructure supplier ?
Life cycle
Does the design process / tools integrate the treatment of Sustainable IT requirements ?
Architecture
Is the technical architecture permanently in line with the activity of the service ?
Architecture
Is a summary of use cases of the features available ?
Architecture
Are de-provisioning operations expressed at design time ?
Architecture
Are all the technical equipment used by the service identified ?
Architecture
Are the characteristics available for each equipment (year of construction, environmental performance data...) ?
Life cycle
Is each function of the service understood in terms of its importance in the service ?
Life cycle
Do secondary functions also have a lower impact on the environmental footprint ?
Life cycle
Is each phase of the life cycle identified with specific actions ?
Life cycle
IsLCA data reused in the event of an adaptation of an existing service ?