Recommendation : 2. Use the technical components that improve the sustainable IT aspects, security and performance
Is the user informed of a processing in progress in the background ?
Performance
B People
B Planet
B Prosperity
Difficulty
N/A
Priority
/
Récurrence
/
Tests
Is there a list of treatments that do not require an immediate outcome?
Precisions
Some processing is invisible from the user's point of view, but may produce delays in response that are not recognised by the user and may lead to repeat operations. The multiplication of unnecessary processing requests degrades Sustainable IT performance.
Additional elements
Rule for assessing the level of compliance of the criterion
0 / 0
Life cycle
Utilisation
16 other criteria related to the recommendation: Use the technical components that improve the sustainable IT aspects, security and performance
Quality
Is the documentation of the functionality available to enable its reuse ?
Performance
Is the web server used asynchronous and multi-threaded ?
Performance
Has the dependency tree of the integrated components been evaluated ?
Performance
Can dependencies be reduced by using an alternative component ?
Performance
Has the integration of asynchronous processing been evaluated ?
Performance
Are unused resources freed up as quickly as possible ?
Performance
Is a VM necessary as opposed to a container solution ?
Performance
Does service availability require redundancy ?
Architecture
Do interactions between components benefit from caching mechanisms ?
Architecture
Are the browser caches not being blocked by the framework or technology used ?
Architecture
Is there a lighter framework / library that meets the functional need ?
Architecture
Is an Open Source solution available for the functional need ?
security
Are the versions of the components used tracked and deployed ?
security
Is the security implemented justified with regard to the operations carried out ?
Data processing
Is the level of logs adapted to the environment ?
Data processing
Are temporary files included in the "logrotate" ?