Recommendation : 2. Reduce the footprint of static content
Is the information overlay removed ?
Animated content
B People
B Planet
C Prosperity
Difficulty
N/A
Priority
/
Récurrence
/
Tests
Are pop-ups useful and essential for understanding the service or message?
Precisions
The proliferation of superimposed information makes the service more difficult to understand and use by audiences less familiar with the technology or those for whom the technology cannot be easily perceived.
Use Case
Source code checks / navigation tests
Additional elements
Rule for assessing the level of compliance of the criterion
0 / 0
Life cycle
Réalisation
13 other criteria related to the recommendation: Reduce the footprint of static content
Pictures
Have the images been compressed upstream in a format suitable for viewing ?
Pictures
What images are really meaningful and useful for understanding the service (examples: logo, images, links, contractual images, etc.) ?
Pictures
What images can we avoid (not useful for understanding the service) ?
Text
Can text replace certain types of images (icons, picto ...) ?
Pictures
Is an alternative to images always available ?
Text
Has the impact of internationalisation (multi-languages, etc.) been assessed ?
Text
Is there a limit to the number of different fonts ?
Text
Do you prefer system fonts ?
Forms
Is the configuration of the form minimal (so as not to overload the code for unhelpful styles) ?
Forms
Does the form allow the user to disable dynamic functions (ex: auto completion) ?
Forms
Are the forms useful (example: not creating an account for the purchase of a product / service - e-commerce) ?
Forms
Are robots banned and unsolicited access treated by inexpensive solutions (captcha vs "addition", ....) ?
Forms
When selection lists are available, are they limited to values relevant to the service user ?