Are an archiving schedule and a lighter version of the old searchable content implemented ?
Are the archiving criteria and the schedule defined?
Often, a significant amount of files, often versioned, are produced to meet customer requirements. Establishing a good file management practice (customer and internal deliverables) is essential. Sorting and deleting obsolete and unusable versions will have a positive impact on storage. Indeed, all this stored data has an environmental cost because it is linked to the use of servers most often, and therefore represents a significant financial cost. Defining a content archiving policy will contribute to responsible and efficient management of the production of the service.
Configuration management take into account all components w/ upgrade process according to their age
Operational issues related to the project
Rule for assessing the level of compliance of the criterion
Volume supprimé / Volume des contenus inactifs
Fin de Vie
8 other criteria related to the recommendation: "Less is More": Focus on essential features and simplify your interface
Is a visual soberness implemented so as to reduce energy resources use and the impact on the material deterioration of the visual, sound and tactile interface's components ?
Are the features used by the user ?
Are decision-making justified and approved by reliable indicators on the use of functionalities throughout the service life cycle ?
Is there a policy / approach / routine for the progressive reduction and prioritization of functionalities, interactions and graphic elements ?
Are the stakeholders of the SEO service involved, starting from the design phase ?
Is the practice of e-mailing considered, justified and reduced to what is strictly necessary ?
Has the analytics been limited to what is strictly necessary to optimize the service ?
Are third-party services (social network feeds, social wall, carousels, google maps, etc.) not used for convenience to compensate for the lack of content production resources ?