Is a visual soberness implemented so as to reduce energy resources use and the impact on the material deterioration of the visual, sound and tactile interface's components ?
UI
B People
A Planet
B Prosperity
Difficulty
N/A
Priority
High
Récurrence
OnUpdate
Tests
Is the graphic charter eco-compatible? Does the graphic charter respect accessibility standards?
Precisions
Visual, sound and tactile elements / components can prioritized a purely aesthetic and / or marketing approach but have very little interest for the user. The simplification of these elements will bring better ergonomics and a use adapted to each one as well as a reduction of the energy impact.
Use Case
Dark mode is always available
Additional elements
Operational issues related to the project
Rule for assessing the level of compliance of the criterion
Formalisés = 100 ; prévus = 75 ; Identifiés = 50 ; Non = 0 / 100
Life cycle
Réalisation
8 other criteria related to the recommendation: "Less is More": Focus on essential features and simplify your interface
Methodology
Are the features used by the user ?
Methodology
Are decision-making justified and approved by reliable indicators on the use of functionalities throughout the service life cycle ?
Methodology
Is there a policy / approach / routine for the progressive reduction and prioritization of functionalities, interactions and graphic elements ?
Technology
Are the stakeholders of the SEO service involved, starting from the design phase ?
Use
Is the practice of e-mailing considered, justified and reduced to what is strictly necessary ?
Use
Are an archiving schedule and a lighter version of the old searchable content implemented ?
Technology
Has the analytics been limited to what is strictly necessary to optimize the service ?
UI
Are third-party services (social network feeds, social wall, carousels, google maps, etc.) not used for convenience to compensate for the lack of content production resources ?