Recommendation : 2. Plan, prepare and validate the availability of Human Resources in Sustianable IT
Do each internal and external stakeholders have the latitude to make decisions that may influence the impact of Sustainable IT ?
Emergence
A People
B Planet
B Prosperity
Difficulty
N/A
Priority
/
Récurrence
/
Tests
Is the decision-making circuit and autonomy having a Sustainable IT impact defined for each actor?
Precisions
Project decisions that can have a significant impact on the environment must be able to be taken quickly. For this, it is essential to define the decision-making space of each actor and the validation mechanisms. In the absence of this clarification, erratic decisions, even for good reasons, could intervene and discredit the Sustainable IT approach, or lead to a form of self-censorship limiting the Sustainable IT benefits.
Additional elements
Rule for assessing the level of compliance of the criterion
0 / 0
Life cycle
N/A
8 other criteria related to the recommendation: Plan, prepare and validate the availability of Human Resources in Sustianable IT
Emergence
Are internal and external stakeholders aware of, or even trained / certified in Sustainable IT ?
Emergence
Do we have the people with the most relevant technical skills for each element of the project ?
Emergence
Are the Sustainable IT referents listed and the list communicated to the actors of the project ?
Emergence
Is a strategy to raise the awareness of colleagues / partners / clients to Sustainable IT in place with steps allowing continuous improvement in practices ?
Emergence
Were the teams questioned before the launch of the project, was the impact assessed and communicated ?
Emergence
Can my targets adhere to my Sustainable IT approach and how ?
Emergence
Will the project with a Sustainable IT approach really meet the needs of my customers ?
Emergence
Are Sustainable IT aspects propagated and maintained across all stakeholders ?