Recommendation : 3. Avoid active content, keep dynamic content under user control
Is the use of Flash removed, replaced by another effect ?
Animated content
C People
A Planet
B Prosperity
Difficulty
**
Priority
High
Récurrence
OnUpdate
Tests
Have you removed the use of flash in the service?
Precisions
Flash technologies (end of life) use a lot of technical resources on the user terminal and require frequent version monitoring and updates, with strong "backward compatibility" limits leading to anticipated peripheral obsolescence.
Use Case
Source code checks to track flash usage
Opquast 14 / GreenIT 115
Additional elements
Operational issues related to the project
Rule for assessing the level of compliance of the criterion
Number of flash calls removed / Number of flash calls
Life cycle
Réalisation
12 other criteria related to the recommendation: Avoid active content, keep dynamic content under user control
Videos
Can the information carried by the video be replaced by an alternative (computer graphics ...) ?
Animated content
Have you limited the animations ?
Animated content
Are active content triggered only on user action ?
Animated content
Is the animated content on the visible part of the screen (no animation triggered under the active part of the screen) ?
Animated content
Is the duration of animated content that has been validated as necessary optimized ?
Videos
Which videos are really meaningful and useful for understanding the service (examples: logo, images, links, contractual images, etc.) ?
Videos
What videos can we avoid (not useful for understanding the service) ?
Videos
Have the alternatives to streaming (vs local video) been evaluated ?
Videos
Is the duration of videos (validated as necessary) optimized ?
Videos
Is broadcasting live sessions useful ?
Sounds
Can the sound of the video be rendered as text ?
Sounds / Videos
Are the CODECS of the sounds compressed to the maximum ?